Archive for May, 2006

One City, Intolerant City

Wednesday, May 31st, 2006

Richmond’s war on nightlife?

It appears that an effort is under way to convert the former Julian’s Restaurant at 2617 W. Broad St. into a gay nightclub…

William J. “Bill” Pantele, whose 2nd District includes the former Julian’s, says he’s heard of plans for a club to go in the space but has few details. Pantele says he’s working on an ordinance that would make it more difficult to convert the restaurant into a nightclub. “I have no interest in a large nightclub of any sort [going in] there,” Pantele says. — Style Weekly, May 31 [Emphasis mine]

What war on nightlife?

Shameless Plug (and proud of it!)

Saturday, May 27th, 2006

I’m very pleased to announce that Andrew’s long-awaited book, Body Piercing Saved My Life: Inside the Phenomenon of Christian Rock, has been published by Da Capo Press and is now available at booksellers and retailers nationwide. [Andrew's got a book blog up here] I understand that early reviews have been very positive and that it was just namechecked in Entertainment Weekly, of all places. We knew him when.

Send kudos and salutations to the man and let him know we are all proud of him. And buy the book!

Goldman’s Reaction

Monday, May 22nd, 2006

Part two of my interview with Richmond firebrand Paul Goldman — on the current status of the ‘City of the Future’ plan and other things — has been posted at RVA Magazine’s website. You can read part one, conducted in early April, right here.

In the following excerpt, Goldman gives his timely thoughts on the Performing Arts Committee’s interim report, and the current state of the “hole in the ground”:

First of all, having read the interim report three times now, you have been right [at Save Richmond.com] in writing they left several very key questions without any answers. So I can appreciate the reason you and others find this situation puzzling, even exasperating. The delay in doing what had been promised has greatly increased, by many millions, the mushrooming cost of even doing what the interim report admits is now just a basic modernization of the Carpenter Center.

The Committee report says the cost of a mere “base plan” [not their "enhanced plan"] for modernizing the Carpenter Center has mushroomed to $45 million, although they don’t provide a way for any outsider reviewer to fully review their math. They also mention a $65 million dollar figure for an “enhanced” modernization, and again, this is not a number you or I can verify. The actual specifics of the funding has caused some questions among experts. For example, the report doesn’t explain how it arrives at an expectation that $12 million in state and federal historic tax credits would be generated by the “basic” modernization.

As you know, as Policy Advisor to the Mayor, I was the point man in the fight for accountability on the part of the Arts Foundation as regards to the millions in public dollars they had been receiving from the city. Before I began the push to make the city’s finance officials account for the money, it had never been done. In that regard, the efforts of SaveRichmond.com deserve the credit for alerting me to the urgent need to speed the review of this spending.

So yes, one could read the interim report as forcing the taxpayers to now pay millions more than ever before due to the delay caused by the failure of the Arts Foundation to do certain things over the previous years. And yes, if you look at the report’s brief outline of the sources for the $45 million, it was no doubt shocking to the public to realize that the Arts Foundation investors where being asked to put up such a small portion of this amount even though the report would, on the surface, allow the Foundation to retain private [as in non-public] control of Carpenter Center…

As Policy Advisor to the Mayor, I always said that if the public was putting up the majority of the money to modernize the Carpenter Center, then the public needed to have the majority of the say as regards it. Remember also: Raising the money to modernize is only part of the monetary parameter here. There is also the operational side of running the Carpenter Center. Can the Center be self-sustaining in that regard? Most experts think it will run at a deficit. Who, then, will cover the red ink?

Bottom line: If the public is going to be asked to put up the majority of the funds to modernize the Carpenter Center (and the interim report suggests public dollars could total between 80-90% of this cost!), then clearly the current ownership/operational structure needs to be revised in fairness to Richmond taxpayers…

You raise another troubling aspect: Best I can tell from the interim report, the millions of public dollars spent on previous designs and whatever may not have much usefulness in terms of what is now being considered. Over 7 million dollars of public money was spent. If a good portion of that money was spent on things of basically little use now, this is most disappointing.

Thanks again to RVA Magazine. You can read the updated interview with Paul Goldman here.

Do You Blog?

Saturday, May 20th, 2006

I know it’s a personal question.

But if the answer is yes, by all means swing by the first-ever RVA Blogs Hookup today (Saturday) at Gallery5 from 2-5PM. Admission to the affair is $5 (to pay for refreshments). It’s not a closed door thing either, according to our fine host and toastmaster Ross: “Anyone and everyone is invited: bloggers, wives of bloggers, people who read blogs, mainstream media folk whom bloggers like to make fun of (I jest!), seriously anyone.”

You heard right: Area internet bloggers, blog-readers and even (gulp!) wives of bloggers “hooking-up” face to face in downtown Richmond. Just imagine…

Yamin’s Wild Ride

Friday, May 19th, 2006

Is it over yet?

OK, OK… I agree with Janet at And Another Thing for the most part (everything but the cheap shot at D’Angelo). She writes about the fervor that accompanied Elliott Yamin on his trip to Richmond last week, and the collective fan fever that she has called “Yaminfluenza” (not so fast, bub - I heard she’s already trademarked it):

…May I say that the taped piece on Elliott’s trip home should be packaged and used by Richmond’s economic development mavens. I could not have been more proud of how Richmond looked in that piece. Even the Diamond didn’t look half bad! But what looked best of all was the enthusiasm of Richmonders, who didn’t come off like yokels but like a vigorous, passionate community. (Where are all these people when we’re trying to get consensus on a performing arts center or baseball stadium?)

Later:

Thank you, Elliott, for lifting this town — at least for a while — out of its murder spree, bear-killing, ballpark drama blues.

And OK, Anonymous, I hear you. Yes, I’ve written mostly about Elliott lately but truthfully I was getting pretty drained from writing about people getting killed and bears getting killed and arts center plans getting killed. This entire town needed a collective palate cleansing. Elliott Yamin was our sorbet.

Personally (and I know it is blasphemous), I haven’t been following “American Idol”— chiefly because it interferes with NBA Playoff viewing time (great games this year, by the way). And so you haven’t read much about Elliott Yamin here at Save Richmond. Mucho apologies but, frankly, everybody else in this town has been going completely BONKERS over him, and it, so there has been little need for anyone else to add to the deluge. I mean: Is there a local angle yet to be uncovered, a position untaken, on Yamin’s Wild Ride?

But, like Janet says, let’s give it up for Elliott anyway: Anyone who can reintroduce the great Donny Hathaway to millions of Americans is OK in my book no matter where he’s from [But, um, Journey — now that I'm not so sure about]. As for Richmond’s brush with Elliott’s fame, and with “idoltry,” the city sure had a bad start to its year and this mass rush has helped many to blow off steam and follow a star. Janet’s right — “Yaminfluenza” has been cathartic.

And one can only hope that it will dawn on the downtown boosters that she was referring to — the ones who are editing together those promotional packages on the hometown boy as we speak — that it was popular music that helped to draw thousands of enthusastic people to downtown Richmond. And sell out a Braves game to boot.

Music With Style

Thursday, May 18th, 2006

I haven’t read all of the 2006 Style Weekly Music Issue yet but I can already tell you it looks like (to paraphrase Captain Beefheart) “the best batch yet.”

Great variety - useful info - interesting debate fodder - hopeful signs - new music (including a review of the very latest disc from our fave-rave Aaron Binder). Now if they had only edited out that long-winded dude at the end….

The Early Reviews

Wednesday, May 10th, 2006

Snoopy at River City Rapids was so disappointed and disgusted by the Performing Arts Committee’s interim report on the “Hole,” he had to split his detailed analysis of the report into three sections just to be able to come up for air occasionally.

People, that’s bad. Read about the Carpenter Center stall here, the plight of the Landmark here and the wobbly financial details here.

At the end, Snoopy poses the same question gnawing at Save Richmond: How can the Mayor possibly sign off on something like this?

Doesn’t sound like the Doug Wilder I know. If it was the School Board, they would be getting their comeuppance.

How on Earth could Doug Wilder or anyone else read this kind of blather and be satisfied and sit there and say this is the way to move forward together? It is certainly not forward and barely even moving.

John Sarvey over at “Buttermilk & Molasses” also read the committee’s report; he likens it to a piece of jagged cutlery being embedded into one’s skull. People, that ain’t good. And he makes a sad summary prediction of where all of this is heading:

The Carpenter Center will remain closed. A large hole on Broad Street will be grassed over. The Landmark will continue to limp along. Committees will continue to meet. Vast sums of money will be spent on bad ideas. And Richmond’s artistic underclass will continue to thrive, even as the financial uberclass pisses reams of cash away.

Genre Slayers

Tuesday, May 9th, 2006

While we contemplate the notion of Richmond’s new VAPAF-approved Center City Arts District, Save Richmond would like to shine the spotlight on one of the cooler ‘street-level’ groups already on the job transforming downtown into a vibrant arts zone.

Patchwork Collective joins a network of organizations and arts groups steadily redefining and promoting Richmond in creative ways, using guerrilla marketing and imaginative promoting to stretch their budgets. In the past year, the Collective has assembled shows (mostly in artspaces such as Gallery5 and the ADA Gallery) that bring together eclectic musical acts from across the country with Richmond’s cutting edge musicians —delving into everything from DJ improv sessions to free jazz to melodic indie-rock.

The behind-the-scenes Patchworkers are Chris Elford, Matt White and Scott Burton. For this second installment of Save Richmond’s in-depth interview series — the first, with Paul Goldman, can be found here — these three busy musician/promoters took time to answer questions about downtown, the arts, Richmond’s music scene, the forthcoming Patchwork Collective CD compilation and why they believe young people can be the city’s most effective and enthusiastic agents for change.

Just imagine… an excerpt:

Save Richmond: For people who are unfamiliar with Patchwork, describe the kinds of concerts, shows and events you promote, and any bands, fellow promoters or venues that you would describe as key collaborators?

Elford: We promote genre-integrated shows. We’re genre-slayers! We promote smaller level shows that are usually more interesting than bigger level shows. We work a lot with local promoters like Parker from Gallery5 and local jazz leader Brian Jones, and of course have an outstanding relationship with John from ADA Gallery, who is one of our biggest supporters.

Save Richmond: How much is admission to these events generally?

Elford: Admission is almost always $5, but it depends on what kind of guarantees we have to meet for the bands… sometimes it’s $6 or $8, it really just depends. You definitely get more than what you pay for.

White: Besides what Chris mentioned I do think that there is starting to be a community of musicians, and bands that are associated in some way with us, or us with them. We are, in many ways, the only promotional organization in Richmond that is encouraging musicians to do crazy things, to come up with bigger better ideas, to challenge their genre and to experiment in anyway they can come up with. The people that have taken the opportunity to do some of these things, regardless of genre, are slowly creating a very vibrant group of artists that we are very proud to support. Certainly people like Brian Jones have been around awhile doing amazing things, but we want to build on that and not let that die out or last for only a generation. That takes the dedication of not only us but of our community.

Burton: Yeah, we just want to encourage creativity, and give people a platform to innovate.

You can read the complete Patchwork Collective interview here.

Soundtrack for an Interim Report

Monday, May 8th, 2006

Summer is approaching, the decks are stacked, and it’s time to sit back and revisit some classic video — in this case, “a forgotten masterpiece of controlled tension” lensed back at Richmond City Council during the meals tax hike in July 2003. This musical short-subject has gone by many titles, including “Feet to the Fire,” but we think “The Roots of a Hole in the Ground” captures it best. Man, those actors are convincing!

The Spirit of Brad

Saturday, May 6th, 2006

I think there is cause for concern when a supposedly-serious, fact-finding, performing arts committee’s interim report begins with the words, Just Imagine…

Like this:

Just imagine… Performing arts patrons enjoying a dinner and Symphony concert. Mothers and Grandmothers taking their children to see the ‘Nutcracker’ ballet for the first time. Young professionals attending an opera or a jazz concert followed by dessert with friends…”

Opera and dessert! The Future is indeed Wow!!

Everybody Loses

Friday, May 5th, 2006

Except Jim Ukrop.

Yesterday, in a stunning step backward for the city and his administration, Mayor Wilder endorsed the outline of a scaled-back $45 million plan to renovate and expand the Carpenter Center and fill in the Brad Armstrong Memorial hole on Broad St. with dirt, grass and trees. In what amounts to a government bailout, the plan calls for the city to commit more money to the project than was even envisioned by the VAPAF in their original, bloated design, yet fails to fully develop the former Thalhimer’s block. Oh, and the VAPAF geniuses who brought us to this point will also continue to be involved, if not in direct control.

Here’s how the $45 million phase I would be paid for:

1) $23 million additional dollars from the city. When adding in the city cash that the VAPAF has already spent ($7.6 million), this would bring the city’s total commitment to the project up to $30.6 million;

2)$12 million from historic tax credits;

3) $10 million in funds from the VAPAF.

Though the admission was not done in the style of the two Jimmy’s (Swaggart and Bakker), the VAPAF has sort of come clean on their fundraising woes. Apparently, of the $67 million+ they claim to have raised, they are really only good for a $10 (million) spot. And $8.5 million of that came from the Commonwealth. Not a lot of private money there, huh Jimbo. Maybe our FOIA requests will be answered now.

So, to recap, the VAPAF has already spent more than $20 million. Aside from the demolition there is really nothing left of value from all of this money. The VAPAF repeatedly mislead just about everyone regarding the amount of money they had raised, how they were spending public money, and the total cost of their project. Yet, somehow we should keep working with these guys?

Perhaps my favorite line of this whole saga comes this morning from the captain of our Titanic, VAPAF Chairman James Ukrop:

We were always a little fuzzy with how we [would] do the back half of the block [along Broad] because we didn’t have the money.

Well thanks for telling us now, Jim - you really inspire us! Though he is more than ultimately responsible for all of the mismanagement, waste and double-talk, none of this seems to stick to him. I am sure that when the Carpenter Center is reopened in 2009 he will be there with the big pair of scissors in hand, VAPAF lapel pin shined up and sparkling. And no one will call him on it.

Meanwhile, our public housing projects fester, our schools crumble and any plans to fix them languish. And all of that money…

Nice work boys.

Mid-Term Report

Friday, May 5th, 2006

The interim report from the performing arts committee is in and Caine O’ Rear is on the scene at Richmond.com.

Some highlights:

The Performing Arts Committee commissioned by Mayor L. Douglas Wilder released its first interim report Thursday, which set the fall of 2009 as the completion date for renovations on the Carpenter Center.

The Carpenter Center, once renovated, would meet the demands for the original performing arts center, Wallace Stettinius, chairman of the group’s Design Sub-Committee, said yesterday during the commitee’s news conference at City Hall.

The committee said it had $45 million for the following renovations to the Carpenter Center: an extended stage house; acoustical improvements; expanded lobby, concession areas and restrooms; expanded seating; upgraded electrical systems; and new HVAC systems.

The mayor, who announced the formation of the committee in November, praised the report, saying his administration would be working in the future to implement its recommendations.

During the conference Thursday, the committee also announced a 120-day time period in which it would determine the feasibility of raising an additional $20 million by the year’s end to develop an “enhanced” Carpenter Center. The additional funds, the report stated, would allow for expanding the theater into a 155,000-square-foot performing arts complex. The “enhanced” project would include a 75,000-square-foot addition to the Carpenter Center, along with a 200-seat community playhouse and a multi-purpose performance space on the Southeastern quadrant of Grace Street.

The chairman acknowledged the lack of any public input into the project to date, even as he refused to totally shut the door on the Virginia Performing Arts Foundation’s original plan.

Robert Grey, chairman of the committee, said in the next 120 days the committee would solicit the public’s input “to make sure we are on track and are accountable to those whose funding we’re asking for.”

Grey later added that development of a Music Hall at the site of the Thalhimer’s block, as originally envisioned by the foundation, was an option, but still in the “consideration stage.”

The arts groups are supportive but understandably guarded — “enhanced” depends on private fundraising.

Committee member David Fisk, chairman of the Richmond Symphony and also a member of the Alliance for the Performing Arts, said the APA was encouraged by the committee’s report. “It is the best plan that can be devised for the funds that are available,” he said.

In a press statement, the APA said the committee’s “enhanced” plan better suited the needs of the City’s performing arts groups.

Fisk added that the committee did a good job in consulting performing arts organizations both large and small that had a vested interest in the project.

This is interesting:

The report also recommended that the CCPA (The Carpenter Center for the Performing Arts) be managed as a non-profit group consisting of public and private board members. The board, once formed, would then hire a staff to run the venue, the report said.

… and the winner of the “Sounds Good To Us But It’s Already Happening” Award goes to:

The report also details the committee’s desire over the long-term to create a “Center City Arts District,” a region of Downtown Richmond bustling with arts venues, hotels, retails and restaurants. “It will further distinguish Richmond from other places,” Wilder said.

The committee’s final report to the mayor is due Dec. 31, 2006. It plans to issue another interim report Sept. 1.

Hopeful signs? A stall job? At this point, after all the deal-making — and with VAPAF board members sitting on the committee — it is anybody’s guess. Didn’t the Virginia Performing Arts Foundation already pledge to restore and renovate the Carpenter Center? What happened to that deal? And why did it take six months for this committee of insiders to finally recommend — to itself basically — that someone should keep their word? Curiouser and curiouser…